Aligning marketing and sales teams is all the rage right now, and for good reason. It is the foundation of many major trends in sales and marketing – including moving from lead generation to demand generation, moving from isolated operations to a RevOps approach, selling to a committee rather than an individual using account-based marketing (ABM), and moving to asynchronous sales.
Although there are many advantages to such coordination, it also presents some obstacles for teams. Below, you’ll learn all about the top five challenges marketing and sales teams face when it comes to alignment, as well as some solutions for successfully aligning the two departments.
Handover from marketing to sales
The handoff between marketing and sales seems simple: once a lead is qualified for sales (a so-called sales-qualified lead or SQL), the marketing team must inform their sales colleagues.
What could possibly go wrong?
The answer: a lot.
In general, there are two problem areas where the handover can fail.
The first is the qualification criteria or agreement on when the lead is to be turned over to sales. Think about what your criteria are for marketing qualified leads (MQLs) and SQLs. How do you ensure that these criteria are met during daily handoffs? How differentiated are the qualifications?
If your sales and marketing teams answer this question differently, handoffs can go awry.
The second area of concern is the mechanism of your handoffs. Are your marketing leads automatically passed on after qualification or is there already an owner before this stage has been reached? Do you assign your sales reps a task, send them a notification, send them an email, notify them via Slack, or combine these options?
Tools such as Marketing Hub and Sales Hub facilitate this process, which, however, only works if it has been precisely defined beforehand. The handoff between marketing and sales needs to be thought through and agreed upon by both teams in order to be successful – that’s much harder if your teams aren’t working with the same systems.
Different systems
Your sales and marketing teams have hundreds of tools at their disposal.
As a result, the list of software and tools your marketing team needs to work with is more extensive than any menu.
Data accuracy is critical for marketing and sales activities – especially when handover is required. The more tools you have, the less likely you are to be able to rely on your data.
Too many systems can have the following consequences, among others:
- Switching between contexts too frequently, resulting in the required data not ending up in the right tool
- Problems with system synchronization and resulting data gaps
- No central database to decide whether activities were successful or not
- Different handover and scoring criteria
Inconsistent data
If you’re struggling with too many tools, inefficient processes for using technology, or a lack of operational leadership (or a combination of these factors), your data suffers. If you can’t trust your data, you’ll make important decisions that impact your clientele without an informed foundation.
Poor data doesn’t just lead to problems with calls because you can’t properly assess your sales team’s pipeline.
Bad data also means that campaigns are not personalized, handoffs are done incorrectly, people are placed in the wrong groups, and interested parties are approached too often or too infrequently.
Your revenue engine is driven by data. Everyone in your organization (marketing and sales executives and customer success teams) needs data to make decisions about interactions with customers.
Different goals and the struggle for MQLs
All marketers are probably familiar with it: You create content to win an MQL and then hand it off to the sales or business development team. These departments then work with the marketing team to convert the person to an SQL.
Once the lead becomes an SQL, an Account Executive takes the helm and closes the deal – regardless of whether the deal was successful or not.
This procedure seems fair at first glance. It has been applied thousands of times by countless marketers. As far as reconciliation is concerned, however, this approach entails numerous risks.
When the marketing team makes it their goal to find MQLs, they focus only on generating as many downloads of protected content as possible.
Why is this a problem? The target audience that enjoys reading your content is not necessarily the one that wants to buy your product right away.
If the sales team is measured by the number of MQLs it can convert into opportunities, problems are inevitable: The interests of the marketing department conflict with the interests of the sales department.
Teams that focus on MQLs rather than revenue and demand will continue to struggle to align their efforts. Good ABM campaigns and a seamless customer experience thus become a distant memory.
Implement successful ABM strategies
The final point we discuss here is the challenge of implementing successful ABM strategies with poorly aligned teams. This is simply not possible!
All of the above problems – poor handoffs, inconsistent systems, inconsistent data, and struggles over MQLs – prevent an organization from implementing successful ABM strategies, especially at scale.
Why is it so hard to achieve your ABM goals when sales and marketing aren’t talking to each other? ABM requires you to be focused on more than one MQL or SQL definition – you need to define an entire buyer committee. That means even more handoffs and better alignment of systems, data and goals.
Who says sales and marketing can’t work well together? In most cases, good tuning is quickly achieved. Listening to each other and then acting consistently is enough in most cases.